Review





Similar Products

98
Mirus Bio nontargeting sirnas control
Nontargeting Sirnas Control, supplied by Mirus Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nontargeting+controls/pm42023950-263-18-25?v=Mirus+Bio
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nontargeting sirnas control - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Sangon Biotech nontargeting control sirna si nc
Proliferation, survival, and invasion phenotypes were reshaped by gain- and loss-of-function perturbation. (A) WB analysis of CENPI protein in HCC cell lines (HCCLM3, Hep3B, and HepG2); HepG2 showed the highest CENPI expression ( n = 3). (B) WB analysis of CENPI protein in si-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; si-CENPI decreased CENPI levels vs <t>si-NC,</t> *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (C) WB analysis of CENPI protein in oe-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; oe-CENPI increased CENPI levels vs oe-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (D) CCK-8 assay for HepG2 proliferation; si-CENPI decreased absorbance (weaker proliferation) vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased it (stronger proliferation) vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). (E) Wound-healing assay for HepG2 migration; healing status recorded at 0/24 h. si-CENPI decelerated wound closure vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI accelerated it vs oe-NC; scale bar = 100 μm, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry for HepG2 apoptosis; apoptotic rates quantified. si-CENPI increased apoptotic rate vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI decreased it vs oe-NC, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (G) Transwell assay for HepG2 invasion in Matrigel-coated chambers; invaded cells stained and counted. si-CENPI reduced invaded cells vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased them vs oe-NC; scale bar = 275 μm, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (H) Flow cytometry for HepG2 cell cycle; si-CENPI increased the proportion of cells in G1 phase and decreased that in S phase vs si-NC, ** p < 0.01, while oe-CENPI showed the opposite effect vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.
Nontargeting Control Sirna Si Nc, supplied by Sangon Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nontargeting+controls/pmc13174019-50-4-11?v=Sangon+Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nontargeting control sirna si nc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Shanghai Genechem Ltd nontargeting scrambled negative control short hairpin rna shnc
Proliferation, survival, and invasion phenotypes were reshaped by gain- and loss-of-function perturbation. (A) WB analysis of CENPI protein in HCC cell lines (HCCLM3, Hep3B, and HepG2); HepG2 showed the highest CENPI expression ( n = 3). (B) WB analysis of CENPI protein in si-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; si-CENPI decreased CENPI levels vs <t>si-NC,</t> *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (C) WB analysis of CENPI protein in oe-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; oe-CENPI increased CENPI levels vs oe-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (D) CCK-8 assay for HepG2 proliferation; si-CENPI decreased absorbance (weaker proliferation) vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased it (stronger proliferation) vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). (E) Wound-healing assay for HepG2 migration; healing status recorded at 0/24 h. si-CENPI decelerated wound closure vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI accelerated it vs oe-NC; scale bar = 100 μm, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry for HepG2 apoptosis; apoptotic rates quantified. si-CENPI increased apoptotic rate vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI decreased it vs oe-NC, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (G) Transwell assay for HepG2 invasion in Matrigel-coated chambers; invaded cells stained and counted. si-CENPI reduced invaded cells vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased them vs oe-NC; scale bar = 275 μm, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (H) Flow cytometry for HepG2 cell cycle; si-CENPI increased the proportion of cells in G1 phase and decreased that in S phase vs si-NC, ** p < 0.01, while oe-CENPI showed the opposite effect vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.
Nontargeting Scrambled Negative Control Short Hairpin Rna Shnc, supplied by Shanghai Genechem Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nontargeting+controls/pmc13265161-79-14-32?v=Shanghai+Genechem+Ltd
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nontargeting scrambled negative control short hairpin rna shnc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Sangon Biotech nontargeting negative control sirna
Proliferation, survival, and invasion phenotypes were reshaped by gain- and loss-of-function perturbation. (A) WB analysis of CENPI protein in HCC cell lines (HCCLM3, Hep3B, and HepG2); HepG2 showed the highest CENPI expression ( n = 3). (B) WB analysis of CENPI protein in si-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; si-CENPI decreased CENPI levels vs <t>si-NC,</t> *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (C) WB analysis of CENPI protein in oe-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; oe-CENPI increased CENPI levels vs oe-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (D) CCK-8 assay for HepG2 proliferation; si-CENPI decreased absorbance (weaker proliferation) vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased it (stronger proliferation) vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). (E) Wound-healing assay for HepG2 migration; healing status recorded at 0/24 h. si-CENPI decelerated wound closure vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI accelerated it vs oe-NC; scale bar = 100 μm, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry for HepG2 apoptosis; apoptotic rates quantified. si-CENPI increased apoptotic rate vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI decreased it vs oe-NC, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (G) Transwell assay for HepG2 invasion in Matrigel-coated chambers; invaded cells stained and counted. si-CENPI reduced invaded cells vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased them vs oe-NC; scale bar = 275 μm, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (H) Flow cytometry for HepG2 cell cycle; si-CENPI increased the proportion of cells in G1 phase and decreased that in S phase vs si-NC, ** p < 0.01, while oe-CENPI showed the opposite effect vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.
Nontargeting Negative Control Sirna, supplied by Sangon Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nontargeting+controls/pm41951014-108-29-33?v=Sangon+Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nontargeting negative control sirna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology nontargeting scrambled shrna
Proliferation, survival, and invasion phenotypes were reshaped by gain- and loss-of-function perturbation. (A) WB analysis of CENPI protein in HCC cell lines (HCCLM3, Hep3B, and HepG2); HepG2 showed the highest CENPI expression ( n = 3). (B) WB analysis of CENPI protein in si-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; si-CENPI decreased CENPI levels vs <t>si-NC,</t> *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (C) WB analysis of CENPI protein in oe-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; oe-CENPI increased CENPI levels vs oe-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (D) CCK-8 assay for HepG2 proliferation; si-CENPI decreased absorbance (weaker proliferation) vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased it (stronger proliferation) vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). (E) Wound-healing assay for HepG2 migration; healing status recorded at 0/24 h. si-CENPI decelerated wound closure vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI accelerated it vs oe-NC; scale bar = 100 μm, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry for HepG2 apoptosis; apoptotic rates quantified. si-CENPI increased apoptotic rate vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI decreased it vs oe-NC, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (G) Transwell assay for HepG2 invasion in Matrigel-coated chambers; invaded cells stained and counted. si-CENPI reduced invaded cells vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased them vs oe-NC; scale bar = 275 μm, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (H) Flow cytometry for HepG2 cell cycle; si-CENPI increased the proportion of cells in G1 phase and decreased that in S phase vs si-NC, ** p < 0.01, while oe-CENPI showed the opposite effect vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.
Nontargeting Scrambled Shrna, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nontargeting+controls/pm41816749-57-1-6?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nontargeting scrambled shrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Genechem shrna nontarget control
Proliferation, survival, and invasion phenotypes were reshaped by gain- and loss-of-function perturbation. (A) WB analysis of CENPI protein in HCC cell lines (HCCLM3, Hep3B, and HepG2); HepG2 showed the highest CENPI expression ( n = 3). (B) WB analysis of CENPI protein in si-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; si-CENPI decreased CENPI levels vs <t>si-NC,</t> *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (C) WB analysis of CENPI protein in oe-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; oe-CENPI increased CENPI levels vs oe-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (D) CCK-8 assay for HepG2 proliferation; si-CENPI decreased absorbance (weaker proliferation) vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased it (stronger proliferation) vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). (E) Wound-healing assay for HepG2 migration; healing status recorded at 0/24 h. si-CENPI decelerated wound closure vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI accelerated it vs oe-NC; scale bar = 100 μm, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry for HepG2 apoptosis; apoptotic rates quantified. si-CENPI increased apoptotic rate vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI decreased it vs oe-NC, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (G) Transwell assay for HepG2 invasion in Matrigel-coated chambers; invaded cells stained and counted. si-CENPI reduced invaded cells vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased them vs oe-NC; scale bar = 275 μm, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (H) Flow cytometry for HepG2 cell cycle; si-CENPI increased the proportion of cells in G1 phase and decreased that in S phase vs si-NC, ** p < 0.01, while oe-CENPI showed the opposite effect vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.
Shrna Nontarget Control, supplied by Genechem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nontargeting+controls/pmc12968730-145-29-37?v=Genechem
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
shrna nontarget control - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology nontargeting shrna control
Proliferation, survival, and invasion phenotypes were reshaped by gain- and loss-of-function perturbation. (A) WB analysis of CENPI protein in HCC cell lines (HCCLM3, Hep3B, and HepG2); HepG2 showed the highest CENPI expression ( n = 3). (B) WB analysis of CENPI protein in si-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; si-CENPI decreased CENPI levels vs <t>si-NC,</t> *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (C) WB analysis of CENPI protein in oe-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; oe-CENPI increased CENPI levels vs oe-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (D) CCK-8 assay for HepG2 proliferation; si-CENPI decreased absorbance (weaker proliferation) vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased it (stronger proliferation) vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). (E) Wound-healing assay for HepG2 migration; healing status recorded at 0/24 h. si-CENPI decelerated wound closure vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI accelerated it vs oe-NC; scale bar = 100 μm, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry for HepG2 apoptosis; apoptotic rates quantified. si-CENPI increased apoptotic rate vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI decreased it vs oe-NC, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (G) Transwell assay for HepG2 invasion in Matrigel-coated chambers; invaded cells stained and counted. si-CENPI reduced invaded cells vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased them vs oe-NC; scale bar = 275 μm, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (H) Flow cytometry for HepG2 cell cycle; si-CENPI increased the proportion of cells in G1 phase and decreased that in S phase vs si-NC, ** p < 0.01, while oe-CENPI showed the opposite effect vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.
Nontargeting Shrna Control, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nontargeting+controls/pm41699318-344-1-4?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nontargeting shrna control - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Genechem nontargeting shrna control sh nc
Proliferation, survival, and invasion phenotypes were reshaped by gain- and loss-of-function perturbation. (A) WB analysis of CENPI protein in HCC cell lines (HCCLM3, Hep3B, and HepG2); HepG2 showed the highest CENPI expression ( n = 3). (B) WB analysis of CENPI protein in si-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; si-CENPI decreased CENPI levels vs <t>si-NC,</t> *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (C) WB analysis of CENPI protein in oe-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; oe-CENPI increased CENPI levels vs oe-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (D) CCK-8 assay for HepG2 proliferation; si-CENPI decreased absorbance (weaker proliferation) vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased it (stronger proliferation) vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). (E) Wound-healing assay for HepG2 migration; healing status recorded at 0/24 h. si-CENPI decelerated wound closure vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI accelerated it vs oe-NC; scale bar = 100 μm, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry for HepG2 apoptosis; apoptotic rates quantified. si-CENPI increased apoptotic rate vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI decreased it vs oe-NC, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (G) Transwell assay for HepG2 invasion in Matrigel-coated chambers; invaded cells stained and counted. si-CENPI reduced invaded cells vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased them vs oe-NC; scale bar = 275 μm, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (H) Flow cytometry for HepG2 cell cycle; si-CENPI increased the proportion of cells in G1 phase and decreased that in S phase vs si-NC, ** p < 0.01, while oe-CENPI showed the opposite effect vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.
Nontargeting Shrna Control Sh Nc, supplied by Genechem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nontargeting+controls/pm41689713-59-14-23?v=Genechem
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nontargeting shrna control sh nc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology nontargeted shctrl
Proliferation, survival, and invasion phenotypes were reshaped by gain- and loss-of-function perturbation. (A) WB analysis of CENPI protein in HCC cell lines (HCCLM3, Hep3B, and HepG2); HepG2 showed the highest CENPI expression ( n = 3). (B) WB analysis of CENPI protein in si-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; si-CENPI decreased CENPI levels vs <t>si-NC,</t> *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (C) WB analysis of CENPI protein in oe-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; oe-CENPI increased CENPI levels vs oe-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (D) CCK-8 assay for HepG2 proliferation; si-CENPI decreased absorbance (weaker proliferation) vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased it (stronger proliferation) vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). (E) Wound-healing assay for HepG2 migration; healing status recorded at 0/24 h. si-CENPI decelerated wound closure vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI accelerated it vs oe-NC; scale bar = 100 μm, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry for HepG2 apoptosis; apoptotic rates quantified. si-CENPI increased apoptotic rate vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI decreased it vs oe-NC, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (G) Transwell assay for HepG2 invasion in Matrigel-coated chambers; invaded cells stained and counted. si-CENPI reduced invaded cells vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased them vs oe-NC; scale bar = 275 μm, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (H) Flow cytometry for HepG2 cell cycle; si-CENPI increased the proportion of cells in G1 phase and decreased that in S phase vs si-NC, ** p < 0.01, while oe-CENPI showed the opposite effect vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.
Nontargeted Shctrl, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nontargeting+controls/pm41671087-431-72-75?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nontargeted shctrl - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Genechem nontargeting negative control sirna si nc
Proliferation, survival, and invasion phenotypes were reshaped by gain- and loss-of-function perturbation. (A) WB analysis of CENPI protein in HCC cell lines (HCCLM3, Hep3B, and HepG2); HepG2 showed the highest CENPI expression ( n = 3). (B) WB analysis of CENPI protein in si-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; si-CENPI decreased CENPI levels vs <t>si-NC,</t> *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (C) WB analysis of CENPI protein in oe-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; oe-CENPI increased CENPI levels vs oe-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (D) CCK-8 assay for HepG2 proliferation; si-CENPI decreased absorbance (weaker proliferation) vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased it (stronger proliferation) vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). (E) Wound-healing assay for HepG2 migration; healing status recorded at 0/24 h. si-CENPI decelerated wound closure vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI accelerated it vs oe-NC; scale bar = 100 μm, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry for HepG2 apoptosis; apoptotic rates quantified. si-CENPI increased apoptotic rate vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI decreased it vs oe-NC, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (G) Transwell assay for HepG2 invasion in Matrigel-coated chambers; invaded cells stained and counted. si-CENPI reduced invaded cells vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased them vs oe-NC; scale bar = 275 μm, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (H) Flow cytometry for HepG2 cell cycle; si-CENPI increased the proportion of cells in G1 phase and decreased that in S phase vs si-NC, ** p < 0.01, while oe-CENPI showed the opposite effect vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.
Nontargeting Negative Control Sirna Si Nc, supplied by Genechem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/nontargeting+controls/pm41662890-55-19-27?v=Genechem
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nontargeting negative control sirna si nc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Proliferation, survival, and invasion phenotypes were reshaped by gain- and loss-of-function perturbation. (A) WB analysis of CENPI protein in HCC cell lines (HCCLM3, Hep3B, and HepG2); HepG2 showed the highest CENPI expression ( n = 3). (B) WB analysis of CENPI protein in si-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; si-CENPI decreased CENPI levels vs si-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (C) WB analysis of CENPI protein in oe-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; oe-CENPI increased CENPI levels vs oe-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (D) CCK-8 assay for HepG2 proliferation; si-CENPI decreased absorbance (weaker proliferation) vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased it (stronger proliferation) vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). (E) Wound-healing assay for HepG2 migration; healing status recorded at 0/24 h. si-CENPI decelerated wound closure vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI accelerated it vs oe-NC; scale bar = 100 μm, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry for HepG2 apoptosis; apoptotic rates quantified. si-CENPI increased apoptotic rate vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI decreased it vs oe-NC, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (G) Transwell assay for HepG2 invasion in Matrigel-coated chambers; invaded cells stained and counted. si-CENPI reduced invaded cells vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased them vs oe-NC; scale bar = 275 μm, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (H) Flow cytometry for HepG2 cell cycle; si-CENPI increased the proportion of cells in G1 phase and decreased that in S phase vs si-NC, ** p < 0.01, while oe-CENPI showed the opposite effect vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.

Journal: Cancer Biology & Therapy

Article Title: Centromere protein I promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR-CDK2 cascade

doi: 10.1080/15384047.2026.2667596

Figure Lengend Snippet: Proliferation, survival, and invasion phenotypes were reshaped by gain- and loss-of-function perturbation. (A) WB analysis of CENPI protein in HCC cell lines (HCCLM3, Hep3B, and HepG2); HepG2 showed the highest CENPI expression ( n = 3). (B) WB analysis of CENPI protein in si-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; si-CENPI decreased CENPI levels vs si-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (C) WB analysis of CENPI protein in oe-CENPI-transfected HepG2 cells; oe-CENPI increased CENPI levels vs oe-NC, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (D) CCK-8 assay for HepG2 proliferation; si-CENPI decreased absorbance (weaker proliferation) vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased it (stronger proliferation) vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). (E) Wound-healing assay for HepG2 migration; healing status recorded at 0/24 h. si-CENPI decelerated wound closure vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI accelerated it vs oe-NC; scale bar = 100 μm, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry for HepG2 apoptosis; apoptotic rates quantified. si-CENPI increased apoptotic rate vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI decreased it vs oe-NC, ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). (G) Transwell assay for HepG2 invasion in Matrigel-coated chambers; invaded cells stained and counted. si-CENPI reduced invaded cells vs si-NC, while oe-CENPI increased them vs oe-NC; scale bar = 275 μm, *** p < 0.001 ( n = 3). (H) Flow cytometry for HepG2 cell cycle; si-CENPI increased the proportion of cells in G1 phase and decreased that in S phase vs si-NC, ** p < 0.01, while oe-CENPI showed the opposite effect vs oe-NC, * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.

Article Snippet: CENPI-targeting siRNAs and a nontargeting control siRNA (si-NC) were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).

Techniques: Expressing, Transfection, CCK-8 Assay, Wound Healing Assay, Migration, Flow Cytometry, Transwell Assay, Staining

Cell cycle and mTORC1 programs emerged as dominant signatures accompanied by CDK2 elevation and EMT marker remodeling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis (top ten significantly enriched pathways); the cell cycle pathway was most significant, with significance represented by −log10 ( p value), based on CENPI-related differentially expressed genes. (B) GSEA analysis of CENPI-related genes; enriched pathways include cell cycle-related (E2F_TARGETS) and mechanism-related (mTORC1_SIGNALING), significance represented by normalized enrichment score (NES). (C) WB analysis of cell cycle-related proteins (CDK2, Cyclin D1) and CENPI in si-CENPI and oe-CENPI-transfected HCC cells; CDK2 showed the most obvious change, ** p < 0.01 vs si-NC and * p < 0.05 vs oe-NC ( n = 3). (D) WB detection of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway proteins (PI3K, p-PI3K, AKT, p-AKT, mTOR, p-mTOR), EMT proteins (N-cadherin, E-cadherin, Vimentin), and CENPI in si-CENPI and oe-CENPI-transfected HCC cells, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.

Journal: Cancer Biology & Therapy

Article Title: Centromere protein I promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR-CDK2 cascade

doi: 10.1080/15384047.2026.2667596

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cell cycle and mTORC1 programs emerged as dominant signatures accompanied by CDK2 elevation and EMT marker remodeling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis (top ten significantly enriched pathways); the cell cycle pathway was most significant, with significance represented by −log10 ( p value), based on CENPI-related differentially expressed genes. (B) GSEA analysis of CENPI-related genes; enriched pathways include cell cycle-related (E2F_TARGETS) and mechanism-related (mTORC1_SIGNALING), significance represented by normalized enrichment score (NES). (C) WB analysis of cell cycle-related proteins (CDK2, Cyclin D1) and CENPI in si-CENPI and oe-CENPI-transfected HCC cells; CDK2 showed the most obvious change, ** p < 0.01 vs si-NC and * p < 0.05 vs oe-NC ( n = 3). (D) WB detection of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway proteins (PI3K, p-PI3K, AKT, p-AKT, mTOR, p-mTOR), EMT proteins (N-cadherin, E-cadherin, Vimentin), and CENPI in si-CENPI and oe-CENPI-transfected HCC cells, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 ( n = 3). Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; error bars represent SD.

Article Snippet: CENPI-targeting siRNAs and a nontargeting control siRNA (si-NC) were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).

Techniques: Marker, Transfection

Orthotopic growth suppression was accompanied by pathway deactivation and reversal of EMT marker directionality. (A and B) Quantification of tumor weight in orthotopic xenograft models; shRNA-mediated CENPI silencing reduced tumor weight compared with models; scale bar = 1 cm, (C) Assessment of body weight changes; CENPI silencing attenuated cachexia-driven body weight loss, *** p < 0.001 vs control and ### p < 0.001 vs model ( n = 6). (D) Measurement of final tumor mass; CENPI silencing decreased tumor mass vs models without overt hepatotoxicity, ** p < 0.01 vs model ( n = 6). (E) WB analysis of EMT markers (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and Vimentin) and PI3K/AKT/mTOR-CDK2 pathway proteins in resected tumor tissues. CENPI silencing induced a mesenchymal-to-epithelial reverting signature, with E-cadherin increased and N-cadherin/Vimentin suppressed. Concomitantly, p-PI3K, p-AKT, p-mTOR, and total CDK2 levels were diminished, indicating inactivation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR-CDK2 relay, * p < 0.05 vs control, # p < 0.05, and ## p < 0.01 vs model ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; error bars represent SD.

Journal: Cancer Biology & Therapy

Article Title: Centromere protein I promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR-CDK2 cascade

doi: 10.1080/15384047.2026.2667596

Figure Lengend Snippet: Orthotopic growth suppression was accompanied by pathway deactivation and reversal of EMT marker directionality. (A and B) Quantification of tumor weight in orthotopic xenograft models; shRNA-mediated CENPI silencing reduced tumor weight compared with models; scale bar = 1 cm, (C) Assessment of body weight changes; CENPI silencing attenuated cachexia-driven body weight loss, *** p < 0.001 vs control and ### p < 0.001 vs model ( n = 6). (D) Measurement of final tumor mass; CENPI silencing decreased tumor mass vs models without overt hepatotoxicity, ** p < 0.01 vs model ( n = 6). (E) WB analysis of EMT markers (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and Vimentin) and PI3K/AKT/mTOR-CDK2 pathway proteins in resected tumor tissues. CENPI silencing induced a mesenchymal-to-epithelial reverting signature, with E-cadherin increased and N-cadherin/Vimentin suppressed. Concomitantly, p-PI3K, p-AKT, p-mTOR, and total CDK2 levels were diminished, indicating inactivation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR-CDK2 relay, * p < 0.05 vs control, # p < 0.05, and ## p < 0.01 vs model ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; error bars represent SD.

Article Snippet: CENPI-targeting siRNAs and a nontargeting control siRNA (si-NC) were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).

Techniques: Marker, shRNA, Control